There is an old saying that “revenue cures all problems”. It’s easy to appreciate the spirit of that adage, but way too often the “wrong revenue” makes the problems even worse. It’s the toxic relationship independent insurance agencies have with revenue/compensation that is the biggest contributor.
Here’s a breakdown of what I mean.
- Let’s assume an insurance producer has a $750,000 book of business.
- We know the average account generates a little under $6,200 of annual revenue.
- Therefore, it would not be uncommon for the producer to have 120 accounts that make up that book.
- As we analyze books of business by listing accounts in descending size of revenue and look at the bottom half (the 50% of accounts that are the smallest in the book), we see that the bottom half of a book generates a little over 6% of the total revenue.
- In this scenario, 6% of $750,000 means the bottom half generates about $45,000 of revenue.
- Knowing there are 60 accounts in the bottom half, the average revenue-per-account in the bottom half is $750.
- We built a calculator and asked a couple dozen agencies to determine the cost to get quotes (fully insured medical, dental, life, disability, and voluntary) for prospects/clients. The average came back around $1,000.
- So, in this very typical scenario, the producer/agency is upside down by $250, on average, for half of the book of business. And, this is just based on the cost to quote, before any additional service work is performed or additional services are given away.
Now, you would think, with that financial reality, the agency/producer would do everything they could to get rid of their unprofitable accounts, wouldn’t you?
But, not only do they NOT get rid of them, they go write more!!
And it all goes back to this toxic relationship with compensation. The collective “we” in this industry are so afraid to face that fear, we lie to ourselves and make excuses. Because we have no control over our revenue, we hold onto every $1 we have, even if it costs us $1.25 to hold on to it.
When I suggest to someone they need to get rid of their unprofitable accounts, the excuses are predictable.
- “Some of those small groups might grow into big accounts.” The reality is the vast majority of them NEVER will, and the cost to hold on to those who won’t grow FAR outweighs the upside of the one that does.
- “They can be referral sources.” What kind of strategy is that?! Do you want unprofitable groups introducing you to more unprofitable groups?!
Be honest with yourself, not every account is a good one. You have to become more disciplined in choosing which accounts you allow the privilege of having access to you, your team, and your resources. Allowing unprofitable accounts into your book of business is, at best, irresponsible.
But making these tough decisions isn’t simply about you. You must overcome this toxic relationship with your revenue/compensation for the benefit of everyone around you.
When you avoid the tough compensation issues . . .
- You hurt your vendor partners (the ones providing the “value-added services”) by devaluing their product. When you simply give it away and/or can’t afford effective implementation of those products/services, it reflects poorly on the quality of that product/service.
- You hurt your team members by saddling them with too many of the wrong accounts. With the smaller margins your book of business generates as a result, they don’t have growth opportunities, they don’t get raises, they don’t get bonuses.
- You hurt your most profitable clients because they are subsidizing your most unprofitable. When half of your clients generate only 6% of revenue, they are being subsidized by the other half that generates 94%.
When you are willing to work for anyone, at any price, someone else has to make up the difference. And, those making up the difference are the people you need most. Don’t continue forcing them to pay the price for your bad business decisions.
Photo by natalia1808.